![The Error of Kant: Resolving the Problem of Universal Ethics - Mr. Daniel J Shepard - Książki - CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platf - 9781466321755 - 25 września 2011](https://imusic.b-cdn.net/images/item/original/755/9781466321755.jpg?mr-daniel-j-shepard-2011-the-error-of-kant-resolving-the-problem-of-universal-ethics-paperback-book&class=scaled&v=1445110934)
Powiedz znajomym o tym przedmiocie:
The Error of Kant: Resolving the Problem of Universal Ethics
Mr. Daniel J Shepard
The Error of Kant: Resolving the Problem of Universal Ethics
Mr. Daniel J Shepard
Regarding paradoxes, Wittgenstein stated: ?It is the business of philosophy not to resolve a contradiction by means of a mathematics or logic discovery but to get a clear view of the state of ? affairs before the contradiction is resolved. (And this does not mean that one is side stepping a difficulty.) Wittgenstein believed philosophy has the responsibility to resolve paradoxes through an interpretation of what seems most reasonable. It is then mathematics and logic, which follow and validate or invalidate such a view. It is the function of the philosophical field known as metaphysics to examine the concept of the whole. Is the physical the whole? If the physical is not the whole then what lies beyond the physical, meta ? beyond, physics ? the physical? Kant proposed a metaphysical system of limited existence ?containing? infinite possibilities. Such a perception is metaphysical in nature for it places a limit upon the whole leading to the question regarding what lies beyond the limit itself. Such a topic lies well beyond the parameters regarding a dialectic of space and time. In fact, such a topic lies beyond the parameters regarding a dialectic of the void of space and time. We will not ignore such a topic, rather we will address the topic of what lies beyond the limits of the whole in Tractate 18: The Emergence of Theoretical Metaphysics. What then are we to examine within this tractate: Tractate 6: Kant and the Void of Space and Time? We are to examine space and time, the void of space and time, passive observation, active observation. In spite of the pronouncements of philosophers to follow Kant, meta-physics, is not dead. Meta-physics has just been set aside while we await a new metaphysical system. Kant said we have no choice but to establish a more comprehensive metaphysical system before we relegate his system to the archives of ancient history. Such then becomes the task of this dialectic for the very purpose of this work to establish both a new metaphysical model and the rationality regarding the new metaphysical model. As we shall see, however, the task of ?replacing? Kant?s system is not to be attempted through the process of destroying Kant metaphysical model but rather the new model is established through the process of fusing Aristotle?s, Kant?s, and Hegel?s model all into one metaphysical model. First: The universe evolves as our thoughts evolve. Second: The concept of a system is critical to metaphysics. Regarding the first concept: The perception, the universe evolves as our thoughts evolve, provides the rationale as to why our understanding of the ?Greater? picture is so important. The concept that the universe evolves as our thoughts evolve implies we actively ?form? what ?will be? as opposed to the past Aristotelian perception that we are merely observers of ?what is?. Regarding the second concept: Kant was the first to propose such an upside down concept as the universe itself evolving as our thoughts evolved. Kant turned metaphysics and thus philosophy on its head just as Copernicus turned cosmology and thus science on its head. Kant was the first metaphysician to step beyond the perceptual metaphysical perception of the day. Kant was able to step beyond the perception of the day regarding the observer passively observing. Kant, however, was unable to step beyond the perception of the day regarding the existence of an Aristotelian closed system. Such conflicting positions generated unwieldy metaphysical contradictions. Kant innovated a perception incapable of being ?confined? within an Aristotelian closed system and thus found himself incapable of finding both first truth and his dearly sought categorical imperative. It is these two concepts, first truth and categorical imperatives, that this work will examine and resolve.
Media | Książki Paperback Book (Książka z miękką okładką i klejonym grzbietem) |
Wydane | 25 września 2011 |
ISBN13 | 9781466321755 |
Wydawcy | CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platf |
Strony | 202 |
Wymiary | 178 × 254 × 11 mm · 362 g |
Język | English |
Więcej od Mr. Daniel J Shepard
Zobacz wszystko od Mr. Daniel J Shepard ( np. Paperback Book )